Serious concerns after ‘peace pledge’ signing
One also expects a certain level of decorum and dignity, coupled with respect for the views of others – even if one is opposed to them.
Robust debate and strong words are expected at this late stage of preparations for the forthcoming local government elections.
Powerful persuasion is almost a pre-requisite as parties go all out to attract voters who may yet be undecided.
In a spirit of democracy, it is almost a case of ‘All’s fair in love and war’.
However, one also expects a certain level of decorum and dignity, coupled with respect for the views of others – even if one is opposed to them.
It was, therefore, alarming to witness the actions and hear the words of political leaders during an event last Friday where all parties participating in the election were to sign a pledge of peace and tolerance.
Given the numerous recent reports of deaths and attacks on politicians in KZN in the run-up to the election, the buy-in of all to a peaceful election was imperative.
The name-calling and verbal insults – even threats – as ugly as they were, could be somewhat excused as a natural outpouring of emotions.
After all, there is a lot at stake in these elections, win or lose.
But there were two elements of the proceedings that are absolute cause for concern.
Both are laid at the feet of the fledgling Economic Freedom Front party, whose arrival in SA politics was initially welcomed as a thorn in the side of a perceived smug and complacent ‘fat cat’ government.
The first was refusal to participate in the singing of the National Anthem when the English and Afrikaans verses were being sung.
What does this say for social cohesion?
When the entire country is crying out for unity and reconciliation, such divisiveness does not bode well.
The second is the reported warning to the incumbent City of uMhlathuze hierarchy that the rules in Council Chambers will not be obeyed if the EFF captures seats.
Having witnessed the many unpalatable scenes during the past parliamentary sittings (and relayed to the entire world), the thought that this could happen right here is alarming.
How can meaningful decisions, which affect the lives of tens of thousands, be reached without following due council process?
How can roads be built, water and electricity be provided and social issues be dealt with outside orderly procedure?
How does disruption and anarchy at the highest level lead to ‘Economic Freedom’ at grassroots?
The analogy is that of a soccer game with no referee, no field markings and no rule book… and ultimately, no result.
